Appearance
Guardian Consent and Minor Access Model
SocioProphet uses a conservative minor-access model.
Legal requirements vary by jurisdiction, but the product default is simple: minors receive more protection, not less.
Participation classes
Adult / independent participant
Full self-managed account and connection flow, subject to role and policy.
Guardian-linked minor participant
Minor participation is tied to a guardian or authorized institutional sponsor.
Institution-governed minor participant
Minor participation may be mediated through an approved program, school, or supervised learning setting, but still remains more restricted than ordinary adult use.
Capability classes
SocioProphet separates capabilities into classes:
- learning and reading
- collaboration and messaging
- provider connections
- automation and browsing
- local runtime / execution
- elevated or sensitive domains
Default access model
| Capability class | Adult | Guardian-linked minor | Institution-governed minor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Learning / reading | Allowed | Allowed | Allowed |
| Collaboration / messaging | Allowed | Conditional | Conditional |
| Provider self-connection | Allowed | Restricted | Restricted |
| Browser automation | Allowed | Restricted | Restricted |
| Local runtime / execution | Allowed | Restricted | Restricted |
| Sensitive / elevated domains | Conditional | Restricted | Conditional |
Product rule
Minors do not self-assemble high-risk provider or runtime capability by default.
Guardian and institutional controls are not an afterthought. They are part of the default operating model.
Required platform behaviors
The platform must support:
- guardian-linked visibility
- explicit consent checkpoints
- capability restrictions by participant class
- incident reporting and escalation
- recoverable auth and connection flows that do not bypass supervision